Dignity And Freedom - Immanuel Kant

Running Head : Dignity and Freedom : Immanuel KantNameCourseUniversityTutorDateKant s theories ar in great occupation with other philosophers . He was a retri just nowivist who believed that big(a) wrongdoers though they are judicious beings , is right , as broad as the crime they did fits such penalty . Punishment without reasons or jailing individual for petty theft is unjust . He verbalise or so penalization on the critique of practical reasons which contrast with Jeremy Benthan a utilitarian theorist who considers punishment as bad and advocates for punishment to ca office more positive impacts on the mortal penalise (Robert , 2000As Betham supports rehabilitation efforts in prisons Kant found such efforts iniquitous as they acted against ones personal clear-sighted choices Kant rejects manipulation of masses fift y-fifty when the causes and reasons are just . spate should be all(a)owed to reason for themselves and their decisions should be respected . Kant criticized other theories on the grounds that they were only sibyllic and could non be applicable in the historical universe . few theories argue that the greater good ought to be considered when playing but such would be irrelevant to someone whose rice beer is not on maintaining the common good . Hypothetical clean-living systems should not be utilise to determine the moral motion as they are very subjective while in the real sense the great unwashed s interests varyHe rejected Hume s theory on the ideal theory of the mind . To Kant analytical methods should not be apply to explain what is physically evident . To him , synthetic recall involves relating images that are not directly related to the subject idea . A prior knowledge can be use in the metaphysics study (Bayne , 2000Kant criticizes the utilitarian view that co mfort is the highest fireeavor He opposes ! this view as it created loopholes where people would be use obviously as means to achieve or disclose happiness .

This would be disrespecting the fact that all tender beings are rational and can choose or plan and promise their futureKant portrays the categorical exacting approach where he sees all human beings as occupants of a special place in establishment . People have different needs which ought to be well-to-do employ certain means .He uses the term byword to refer to intentions or principle of action . Human beings should not act in a way that portrays other people simply as means to an end but as an end to itself . In working to attain the maxim people should not use others simply as means to an end . People used should benefit from the arrangement and their consent should be sought To him , duties should be beneficial to people used in the process of attaining the addresss . I agree with Kant s theory as all people should be treated with equality and with respectThere are dickens types of dogmatics . The hypothetical imperative tells of what we ought to do to achieve a goal . The categorical imperative leads to absoluteness since human beings are rational and can curb their actions . People should only act on...If you necessitate to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper