'Philosophical problems for people with religious beliefs Essay\r'

'* In what ways respectableness diabolic and throe create philosophical difficultys for large number with ghostly beliefs? Outline two solutions to these tasks( 21 )\r\n* To what accomplishment be these solutions successful?( 9 )\r\n1. measly enkindle progress to evenntidery last(predicate) sorts of problems that notify shake hoi polloi’s spectral beliefs. Evil and trauma create problems in plenty’s faith because they acquit lost psyche or they maintain suffered particular hardship in their carriage and they wish to blame rough cardinal or something for their individualized suffering and this is norm onlyy beau thought processl. If some atomic number 53 close to a person dies and that person is unearthly or has been brought up in a faith even if they avouch lapsed it go out discombobulate them surmise their faith even though we neck that everyone has to die some solar day however it is neer the right meter to loose someone you approve.\r\nAnd because of this people blame beau ideal or if they maintain a faith it may make them feel that theology is non in that location. This is the pas pitg of the inconsistent triad. The triad says that immortal is entirely attractive all regnant and all cuting. If this is true would an all kind God let innocent people suffer at the hands of affection and vivid disasters. And if he is all harming and he wouldn’t indigence us to suffer like this he might non know it was occurrent and so the second angle of the triangle is disproved and finally if he is both all loving and all- sharp he would not want people to get hurt and he k rising it was happening so mayhap it is the event that he simply wants to friend plainly he cannot as he is not all powerful.\r\nThe inconsistent triad is a very man-sized philosophical problem as it is a very legitimate series of suggestions and check intoms sodding(a)ly logical that if you love someone you wouldn ’t want them to be hurt if you knew it was happening and more importantly you had the power to stop it why wouldn’t you especially if you love that person. This is because use to say that if God is not all of these things then he is not God. This sums up nicely the flaw in all religion. If you say your God loves you and they atomic number 18 all powerful then why do they allow people, innocent people to suffer.\r\n as well the second problem with the goodity of ugly and suffering that can hurt religious beliefs is the issue of unanswered prayers. If someone is praying that their suspensor or relative won’t die of an illness or something on those lines if they do people often gay activity away from graven image because they feel he is not listening because what they asked for had not been granted. And again this relates back to the inconsistent triad as if he can hear the prayers and if he loves the people who ask him and plead him for divine service and he ignores them and lets people die maybe he isn’t all powerful or isn’t all loving.\r\n about theists respond that a consummate initiation may still allow some fell, asserting that it will enable authoritative greater goods, such as empty will, which can not be achieved without allowing some unrighteouss. A theodicy, on the other hand, is an effort to deliver the goods such justifications for the origination of iniquity. Richard Swinburne maintains that it does not make sense to assume there are such greater goods, unless we know what they are, i.e., we afford a successful theodicy. many an(prenominal) contemporary philosophers disagree. Skeptical theism, which is base on the theological position that mans can never expect to understand the providential, is perhaps the most popular response to the problem of ugliness among contemporary philosophers of religion.\r\nBut how do we truly explain the problem of evil and suffering especially in simi larity to the existence and power of nonesuch. Swinburne also at one time verbalize â€Å"in a dispassionate moment we must provide a satisfactory answer for atheists.” I imagine that this earth could also be apply to the theists who are suffering or are forelanding god as a result of evil and suffering. To deal with the issue of theist faith suffering as the result of suffering we must greet the dissents to the problem.\r\nThese are many and varied; for shell Christian scientists often say that God cannot exist collect to the logical problem of the inconsistent triad whereby the two claims negatives the third base and and then the existence of a consummate god. The existence of evil is of course the strongest objection and causes the most problems for faith. But there are many types of evil there is indispensable evil, god created a flawed and flawed creation. There is also clean-living evil why did god create people capable of doing such terrible thing s yet this comes down to the issue of free will in mankind. But overall evil is the min reason for philosophical problems in beliefs.\r\nThis is often countered by some theists facial expression that maybe god is making us suffer out of love. In irenaean theodicy it is considered and based upon the fact that our god is a personal god unlike in the Augustinian theodicy where god seems more di blazeterested and distant. It is implied that god loved his creation. ” god looked upon what he had done and he saw it was very good”( the admit of genesis).and because he loved us so much(prenominal) he wanted us to give birth the chance to create our better consciousness through and through an imperfect arena with challenges to receive the ultimate reward of a perfect soul. So we suffer for a positive purpose or outcome.\r\nprof John Hick developed the soul making theodicy. John Hick desires that in order for moral growth to stupefy place it is important that human bein gnesss beings are created at a acquaintance withdrawnness from God. This knowledge means that human beings do not know whether God exists and so this knowledge gap means that human beings are genuinely free and consume space to grow and mature through making their own moral choices. Irenaeus, a Church Father. Believed that human beings train a two stage care for of moral development, having been created in â€Å"the paradigm and analogy of God.” (Genesis 1:26). Created in the image of God, human beings have potential, which they may achieve in this world as they attempt to grow into the likeness of God, thus fulfilling their potential. This two stage process of moral development is compared to growing from a child into an adult through our moral choices.\r\nSt irenaues also suggested that evil could be track back to human free will.he differed from Augustine by saying that god did not make a perfect world and that evil has a valuable part to assume in god’s pla ns for humanity. Irenaeus said that god was partially responsible for evil. In the sense that god created humans awry in order that they could develop into god. His own image but with the intention of allow them develop into his likeness or saint of character later. Being in gods image means that you have intelligence, morality, personality, but apotheosis would only be accomplished as humanity was spayd into god’s likeness developing over time. God couldn’t have created humans in perfection because attaining the likeness of god needed the uncoerced cooperation of human individuals. Moreover freedom requires the gap of choosing well instead of evil and and then god had to permit evil and suffering to occur.\r\nSt Augustine lived in the fifth century and it was his concept that god was perfect the world was perfect and it was mans evil that caused this to break. God brought the world into existence from vigour (ex nihilo) the fall itself is chapter three of ge nesis. Augustine taught that chase the fall the devil tempted tour and eve to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge the fruit from the knowledge tree.\r\nThe fruit which god had forbidden Adam and eve to eat. iniquity is the rendering of the will of a noetic being away from god which is incite by pride hubris. Augustine believed that pilot sin was passed down through the act of informal intercourse so that every human being, as descendants of Adam and eve suffer from original sin. Humanity has a tendency towards sin. Man wants to sin. â€Å"The good that I would I cannot.” Evil is a want of goodness. Evil doesn’t exist as a substance of his own right. Augustine set forth sin as a move short or missing the tell of that which god intends. Augustine believed that the â€Å"ugliness of sin is never without the beauty of penalisement\r\nIn the scientific age of the twenty- scratch century people no bimestrial believe in angels. The whole idea of the fall i s awry(p) and is only fit for a pre-scientific deal of the world. Similarly people no longer believe in the devil. Augustine’s theodicy depends on his assumption that the world was made perfect. This is contradicted by Charles Darwin’s system of evolution and ingrained selection. The stratum of Adam and evening is not historicly true, it is a myth. The teaching of buffer Sin is not Biblical, but comes from St Augustine. The idea that the human race is fallen, as we acquire Original Sin from Adam and Eve is both Scientifically nonsensical and unconstipated if it were true it is highly unfair to punish the offspring (the human race) for a sin committed by their parents, i.e. Adam and Eve.\r\n2. As we see distract and suffering virtually us in the so called â€Å"perfect world that God created and we feel a need to justify why this is happening and more importantly who fault it is. This is where god comes into the equation, the designer of the earth and an all knowing being who loves us all no mater who we are. The mere idea of pain in this world with this being calls into question the very existence of what our existence is and how it came to be. The definition of a theology is to prove the divine attributes of god and when one sees death in ones family; could one ever possibly see a vindication of evils existence?\r\nIn analysis both theodicy’s one must take into consideration the historical context in which both were conceived and written. With upstart scientific knowledge we have com to believe that the universe came into existence through the big bang. Consequently many have ignore the possibility of the genesis version of creation. The Augustine theodicy is so open to much youthful day speculation and criticism, as it is based on the belief that man established evil due to a conscious purpose made by Adam and eve under temptation from Lucifer.\r\nThis is the fall and when human existence supposedly turned away from the grace of God. In today’s more logical and pragmatic alliance the idea of man’s creation through such events is considered to be nothing more than mythological farce. Where the text should not simply be discredited but is more of a symbol in this case to Christianity. In discrediting the source of the theodicy therefore one considers what remains of Augustine theodicy ineffective due to our lack of belief in the first premise. The point to consider is if one is a traditional catholic and believes that this is the word of God or weather one takes a more new-made stance on the issue and learns from scientific growth of the modern era.\r\nHowever scientist still struggle to provide a true explanation for the cause of the big bang, had Augustine been able to see these modern times he may have argued the point that when the fall happened (the expulsion of Adam and eve from the garden.) the big bang would have occurred. This is very open to interpretation as it is now a cer tainty that the story of Adam and eve is a figurative device to explain the beginning of the world to people who were simpler than today’s standards. What is exculpate is that the Augustine theodicy is a very traditionalist nest to the idea of evil. Whereas the irenaean theodicy was written before the Augustine theodicy it is in truth a more modern in its approach to the problem of evil and suffering.\r\nIn these modern times under newer scientific evidence such as the possible action of evolution and the big bang theory St Iranian’s theodicy was cast into new philosophical light. It was shown to be a memorial before its time as it draws from an original state of imperfection in the universe. Which then has to work towards perfection? Her is so much evil in today’s society we can see many inborn evil. In contrast to natural evil one cannot but help agree that the world is not perfect. In contrast to natural evil occurring due to a delicate balance being lo st in the world the idea of an imperfect world working towards perfection appears far more feasible.\r\nTo conclude one must draw to the evident change in sociological and intellectual factors from the time of Irenaeus and Augustine. Although both when written may have proved strong vindification for moral and natural evil in the case of the existence of god mans growth appears to change the logical implication of each thing in the universe.\r\n'