English Proficiency Conclusion

Conclusions On the basis of the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn 1. A great mass of the reactents are staminate, graduates of public exalted schools, and pursuing the degree program live of Science in Civil Engineering (BSCE). 2. When the respondents are grouped agree to the variable gender, their general level of proficiency in the four position grammar skills is Poorly Proficient.When they are grouped fit to the variable type of high gear school attended, their overall level of proficiency in the four English grammar skills is Poorly Proficient. When the respondents are grouped according to the variable degree program, their overall level of proficiency in the four English grammar skills is Poorly Proficient. 3. The respondents do not dissent monumentally in their skills in asking questions and in responding to questions when they are grouped according to the variable gender.In other words, the male respondents force to ask questions and to respond to questions does not differ from that of the female respondents ability to fulfil the same grammar skills. On the other hand, the respondents differ significantly in their skills in combine sentences and in expanding sentences when they are grouped according to the variable gender. That is, the male respondents ability to combine sentences and to expand sentences differs from that of the female respondents ability to perform verbalize grammar skills.As to the variable type of high school attended, the respondents do not differ significantly in their skills in asking questions, in responding to questions, in combining sentences, and in expanding sentences. That is, the private high school graduates ability to ask questions, to respond to questions, to combine sentences, and to expand sentences do not differ from that of the public high school graduates ability to perform give tongue to grammar skills.When the respondents are grouped according to their respective degree p rograms/sections, they differ significantly in their skills in asking questions, in combining sentences, and in expanding sentences but there is no significant difference in their skills in responding to questions. In other words, the respondents from each of the leash sections differ from each other in their ability to perform said grammar skills.