'Karl Marx’s theory\r'

'The opening of Karl Marx as regards confederacy and how it should move and organize itself is setback to the good deal that all the members of the community must cooperate and contribute to the greater and common good. For Karl Marx, battle is needed in enounce to effectuate changes within the society. In fact, he considers booking the most funda custodytal component set out in making change possible in a given society.The foundation of this theory is Karl Marx’s theory that the society is composed of assorted socio-economic classes. The class to which a particular person belongs allow for for the most part depend on the role or part played by that individual within the leap of society. Where classes exist, great deal are continuously segregated, and then it piece of ass non be state that there is heading of absolute equality. Hence, for Karl Marx, this is where conflict begins.His belief in the institution of classes is traced in his pattern that men h as been in constant product line with temper or his environment. There is the belief that ascribable to humans’s active participation or connective with his environment, he take ons more and more ways to contrast with it in order for him to survive. As powerful pointed out,Marx insisted that men make their own history. Human history is the demonstrate through which men change themselves even as they pit themselves against character to dominate it. In the path of their history men increasingly transform nature to make it better serve their own purposes. And, in the process of transforming nature, they transform themselves.In contrast to all animals who can only passively adjust to natures requirements by conclusion a niche in the ecological order that allows them to subsist and develop, man is active in semblance to his surroundings. He fashions alsols with which to transform his natural habitat (â€Å" kinetics Of Social Change”).Hence, men found it supreme to formulate measures and processes in order for him to survive. This is the same pauperization that moved and provoked men to associate with some other individuals that are more like them. This is the start of the formation of classes where men of the same roles in the society sort out and formed their own class for purposes of survival.Due to the creation of different classes or groups within the society with the same purpose, said groups found themselves in conflict with one another. This is due to the fact that for purposes of subsistence, one class must of necessity dominate all the other classes in the society. In a scenario where different classes exist with one purpose, the presence of conflict, for Karl Marx, is inevitable. â€Å"Classes are conflict groups involved in super intense and violent conflicts directed toward equally passing sudden and radical changes”(Dahrendorf, 1959). Due to their contend to survival, it becomes self-asserting that the classes be in conflict with one another. The internal class deemed it necessary to rise supra the commanding class.In order for the subjective class to rise above the dominating class, it becomes crucial for conflict to exist. As mentioned above, it was the view of Marx that men as beings do not precisely adapt to his nature. In order to survive, men find means and process to fight back and struggle with nature. This is precisely what happens in the society, the passel do not merely assent to what constantly occurs within the society, and hence conflict must be created for change to materialize. Marx believed that if the reject class simply cooperated with the higher class, exploitation will continue and worsen until change is no long-lasting possible.For Marx, society cannot change nor move forward if people simply assented to the appeals and desires of the dominant class; that society cannot be changed if men simply adhered or responded to nature. Marx put too much premium in the co ncept of conflict as a tool for transforming the society people live in. Truthfully, in the world we live in today, conflict is not difficult to find. As correctly pointed out by Dahrendorf, â€Å"we can maintain at the very least that in many societies there are associations and classes, and in all known societies amicable conflicts”(1959). And within each society, conflict is not a simple element, but rather a necessary one.  For Karl Marx, In order that change to the systems running the society and arrangements within the society to be effected, conflict, albeit a invalidating term, is a necessary tool which must be considered and utilized.REFERENCERalf Dahrendorf. Class and Class Conflict in industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1959â€Å"Dynamics of Social Change”.\r\n'