Hale, Duane. Cyrus N. Ray: The Abilene Man

Cyrus Newton spear was a man who found his bushel purpose of fulfillment by determination evidences of artifacts from the past. His cowcatcher studies were focused on the medical domain osteopathy, which he received a degree for in June 2, 1909. It is bizarre to know that archeology was non Cyrus N. Rays field of study. He has found a society called Texas Archeological and Paleontological social club (Texas Archeological Society) in 1928. Because he was an recreational at archaeology, his name is comfortably known in the Texas archaeological world.Osteopathy and the finding of human skulls have unity thing in common the relevance to the b 1s. The huge field loss between osteopathy and archaeology is very different, but this only concludes one thing. level has intrigued Cyrus N. Ray so much that it has caused him to switch his professions from the medical field to archaeology. He feels content when he is slowly discovering a little bit of explanation every time he finds an artifact. Content Cyrus Newton Ray was an amateur at archaeology because that field of study was not even his original profession.His original profession was osteopathy but because he got drawn in one day by reading an article by Dr. Harold J. Cook, which described the finding of arrowheads embedded in gravel with the skeleton of a buffalo of an nonextant Pleistocene species at Colorado City, Texas Ever since then, he has discovered galore(postnominal) different artifacts that made him well known in the Texas world of archaeology due to the fact that Texas was one of the only state where archaeology was not at importance.His determination for archaeology was full of willpower that even through and through the Great Depression, Ray still used his own money to inconvenience articles about his current findings. Cyrus N. Ray wanted everyone to know about his findings because he wanted everyone to be fascinated by the history tied to the artifacts. survey From reading this article , I felt as though the author, Duane Kendall Hale, did have a noticeable biasness. It was a little misleading because the author gives two points of spate on Cyrus N. Ray.Most of the time, the author continuously says throughout the article, that some of Rays discoveries were credited to others. And many of the other archaeologists would completely not identify Rays name when reporting their findings. For the author, he feels as though this isnt fair for Cyrus N. Ray. But then, the author mentions that Ray kept his spatial relation secretive, and because of that, future chances of discoveries were lowered because he kept his locations confidential. Also, the author concludes that Ray was herculean to work with, and his personality was not very compatible with others.I was convert by the authors thesis because history is so eventful to our society right now. Presently, we just cant focus on the present and disregard the past forever. The past happened for a reason and it is in that respect for us to acknowledge it. So for someone with a completely different profession like Cyrus N. Ray, it was a great thing for him to go into archaeology to figure out the past even more. This passage was relatively well-situated to read because it was a biography, but with the biased voice of the author thrown in, it made it a little harder to comprehend.